Not me. I could only remember my earlier pleasure with similar sculpture at other times in my life.
The big card like sculpture that lent on Franklin Street in the late seventies, with a neighborhood kid's sneakers thrown up on it. I was amazed when it was removed, it was so great, I thought it would always be there.
Then the Rotary near the Holland Tunnel in the early eighties. I was there late one night and hurled a spearlike 2x4 over the sculpture. I ripped my hand as a nail passing in the night drew blood. We were the Achaeans at the WALL.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c580b/c580b76ef18b40ac9ab462c60de35d2e992912d7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57b8e/57b8e85b4b964c4ca84219f88cbb17fe8f1ac6e1" alt=""
We found drawings lying near the not yet covered concrete footings. Big rolls of Arches paper with 8 foot arcs of oil stick. I told John Chamberlain about them one night at a bar he said , "So what, kid?"
A little later Richard himself tried to hit me when I disturbed him late at night at the bar, One University, trying to tell him I had them.
I think later that night I tossed them out on the street.
Recently I was up at DIA Beacon early in the morning and spent some time with the sculpture there, and also at the Pulitzer in St Louis there is a sculpture really great, I saw last summer.
But I don't know? The new sculpture, they seem mannered? A little too curvy, too pretty now and easy-- a good test is, the tourist, they wouldn't like as much the plain elemental sculpture of 15 years ago. It was a big deal when one recognized they arced just a bit inward!
I just don't get what pleasure the curators and artists themselves are getting? Anybody want to go back for a second look wrangling with those crowds?
No comments:
Post a Comment